Srinagar, April 2, 2025 – The proposed Waqf Amendment Bill has sparked significant debate in Jammu and Kashmir, with prominent leaders expressing apprehension about its implications for the Muslim community. The bill, intended to reform the management of Waqf properties, has drawn criticism for allegedly singling out one religious group.
Gulam Ali Khatana, a notable figure, stated, “They fear that Muslims may enter the mainstream and are spreading fear. The Waqf Act is intended for the benefit of Muslims.” His remarks reflect concerns that the amendments could undermine the community’s interests and create unnecessary apprehension.
Similarly, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah has strongly opposed the bill, calling it discriminatory. Speaking in Srinagar, Abdullah said, “This bill seems to target only one religion… Targeting Waqf is unfortunate because it seems this action is being taken only against us… Our MPs will oppose this bill.” His comments underscore a broader sentiment that the legislation unfairly focuses on Muslim charitable institutions while ignoring similar frameworks in other communities.
The Waqf Act governs properties dedicated for religious or charitable purposes under Islamic law, aimed at supporting community welfare. Critics argue that the proposed changes could disrupt the autonomy of Waqf boards and hinder their ability to serve marginalized groups. Supporters, however, claim the amendments are necessary to improve transparency and curb mismanagement.
The controversy has ignited discussions across the region, with political leaders and community members urging a reconsideration of the bill’s provisions. As the matter heads to Parliament, opposition from Jammu and Kashmir’s representatives signals a contentious debate ahead.