During a session at the United Nations Human Rights Council, Indian diplomat Kshitij Tyagi provided a strong and fact-based rebuttal to Pakistan’s allegations concerning the human rights situation in Jammu and Kashmir. The backdrop of this confrontation lies in the long-standing dispute between India and Pakistan over Kashmir, which has been a source of conflict for decades. Pakistan has consistently accused India of human rights violations, especially following the revocation of Article 370 in August 2019, which granted Kashmir special status within the Indian Constitution. In response, India has repeatedly denied these allegations, asserting that the move was an internal matter aimed at promoting development and integration in the region. Kshitij Tyagi’s intervention at the UNHRC was significant. He took the opportunity to counter Pakistan’s claims, emphasising the factual inaccuracies in their narrative. He pointed out that Pakistan’s accusations were driven more by political motives than a genuine concern for human rights. He also criticized Pakistan’s own human rights record, highlighting the treatment of minorities within Pakistan, particularly in regions like Balochistan. In his remarks, he reminded the international community that Pakistan’s track record on human rights is far from exemplary. Furthermore, he defended India’s decision to revoke Article 370, describing it as an internal matter fully within India’s constitutional rights. He pointed out that the Indian Parliament had approved the decision, and it was consistent with India’s democratic values. Tyagi also highlighted the positive changes taking place in Jammu and Kashmir, such as improved infrastructure and greater political participation. He stressed that these efforts were being made in the face of challenges, particularly terrorism, which he blamed on Pakistan-based militant groups. By providing this context, Tyagi sought to present a more nuanced picture of the situation in Kashmir. The fact-check presented by Tyagi was significant for several reasons. First, it provided a clear and well-supported counter-narrative to Pakistan’s claims, offering the international community a more accurate portrayal of the situation. Tyagi’s approach was grounded in facts and legal principles, which helped emphasize India’s commitment to human rights and the rule of law. Second, it highlighted the importance of using facts to combat disinformation in global forums. In an era where information warfare is common, such fact-based interventions are essential for maintaining credibility and truth. Kshitij Tyagi’s speech also underscored the changing dynamics of global diplomacy. Diplomatic representatives today rely on factual evidence, historical context, and legal frameworks to defend their positions. This marks a departure from purely emotional or confrontational rhetoric and reflects a more strategic approach to international relations. By confronting misinformation with a clear, fact-based argument, Tyagi was able to challenge the false narrative being pushed by Pakistan and reinforce India’s sovereignty. The incident also has broader implications for India-Pakistan relations. It signals that India is becoming more confident in asserting its position on the global stage. Through platforms like the UNHRC, India is not only defending its actions but also promoting peace, development, and sovereignty. This approach marks a shift from the historical dynamics of hostility and mistrust that have defined India-Pakistan relations. Kshitij Tyagi’s intervention at the UNHRC was a powerful example of using facts and legal arguments to counter disinformation in international diplomacy. His speech effectively challenged Pakistan’s claims, providing a clear and factual account of India’s position on the Kashmir issue. This exchange highlights the importance of truth in shaping global opinion and reinforces the need for countries to stand firm in the face of misinformation. Tyagi’s fact-check was a reminder that in today’s world of interconnected diplomacy, truth remains a powerful tool in the battle for international influence.